I signed a consensual blackmail contract with her. she has pictures and videos of me. I gave him my personal information. And my mother’s information. But she charges me way more than I can bear. In the last 2 weeks I have spent a total of €800 on her and she keeps asking for more. I don’t know what to do, because I can’t use the law against her. all answers much appreciated.
I think she “nullifies” their mutual “contract”.
Go to the police or let them report you. It’s not going to end well.
blackmail contract
Thanks for the deep answer. It’s been a few years since I wrote this post. I’m still with the same lady. And our relationship has evolved further in the world of finds. I now have a promissory note written with her that says I owe her €8,000 which is to be paid over a 3 year period at 18% interest. In addition, she has power of attorney over my bank accounts. And we signed a model release form for photos, films and sound from me. So I totally agree with you Normal consensual blackmail is not very real. But with some simple documents like this, it’s very real. And the debt is real too. But I grew to love this lifestyle. So I’m not looking for a way out. But thanks to everyone who replied
I know you don’t want to use the law but maybe you should consult a lawyer or just say no and call it a bluff
threatening to kill her and give her pieces to the dogs or recording her picture or something and threatening to post it on the internet with a prostitute tag
Answer 6
complain to the police
Answer 7
Although I can only say a prayer and knock on wood until 2 years later an answer has been updated to the original questioner I see that no proper answer has been given and so anyone else in such a situation would find this page crushed insight to have hope. So I hope this can help anyone who really needs an answer to this kind of serious situation.
The following “Trick of the Blackmail Trade” is reproduced with permission:
“Ultimately, the vast majority of blackmail providers would choose the money and submission of each of the blackmail consumers over reporting them. As a Blackmail-Dom’s primary source of control over a customer is the information personalities she has about her, there’s a lot of power in her “ability” to expose her, letting the scales tip in her favor is the last thing she wants to do. a blackmailer-Dominatrix’s last resort. Once she divulges information about the client (or gives “too much”), that proverbial monetary asset immediately dries up. who make the revelation; rather, it is the narcissistic and greedy individuals who recklessly ruin lives.
While it’s a bad decision (pun intended) for a Blackmailing-Dom to throw power-informing information to the wind, it has an advantage that goes beyond that. Pretty much the whole (fundamental) point of erotic blackmail fetishism is the “ability” of the gift to devastate the participant’s life unless they do what they are told to do. It is NOT centered around a Gift causing this potential destruction. So, to put it simply, the blackmailed client does not want their information leaked. It may seem that I am talking in circles, and that we come back to the obvious influence of the Doms. However, the “higher leverage” she has is directly related to this, so try to hang on to me a bit longer.
Note that this document spoke of “tricks” used in contracts based on blackmail and that it was not about “legality”. Tip #15, for example, dealt with the “unilateral modification clause”. Well, the use of such a clause in a contract was deemed “illusory” and “unenforceable” in 2009 by a US federal court (v. Harris v. Blockbuster Inc.) – thus putting it on the edge to be illegal. . Most of the cheats listed above have dubious legality, hot controversy over their use, wouldn’t hold up in court, or are just plain illegal. U.S. Federal Trade Commission regulations note that “unfair acts” or “deceptive acts”… are illegal (15 USC § 45(a)), and almost all of the “tricks” I’ve discussed would fall in this area of ”deception”. But before you start screaming “mischief”, assuming I just denied the point of it all.
Well, it seems most men who dabble in the world of consensual blackmail would rather not be exposed (yes, that was an understatement), the legality of a contract based on blackmail is not an issue as well important than many think. Allow me to set the proverbial scene for a moment. Aside from credit card companies (and a few other specific markets), there’s still no US land law on what defines legally allowed font sizes in contracts (speaking of “Fine-Print”) ). Ask a dozen lawyers and you’ll get a dozen different answers. For now, there are only font size recommendations (but no real rules apart from a broad “rule of thumb”). As for the recommended size, it’s not to avoid criminal charges (since there’s nothing to charge – you can’t be stopped by a law that doesn’t exist), but to protect yourself from wanted.
Once someone has signed a contract, the only way to neutralize the negative consequences caused by misleading fine print (as in tip 4) would be to take the other party to a civil court (action against the accused “sly”). When it comes to civil actions, it’s almost always a complex (say) “weighing of the hands” to see if it’s worth it.
Small Claims Court is relatively inexpensive, but cannot be used for so-called “large” actions. Now, when it comes to civil litigation, the costs can quickly destroy a person’s financial “glass ceiling”. Just to give you a simplistic and inexpensive example:
$200 for court costs
$100 for the summons
$50 for archiving
$50 for document certification
$1000 for the lawyer
This simplified and inexpensive example amounts to $1,400 in fees for the proponent. (About half of civil lawsuits are a bill of about $5,000.) Now add in time, travel, more expenses, and a bathtub full of hodgepodge. (Then there’s also the attempt to bring the defendant to justice, possible countersuits, and countless other assumptions that cost money — not to mention the odds of losing the case.) Seeing all of this , it’s no surprise that the majority of civil lawsuits are settled, dropped, or never filed.
Now I can go back to the ‘Larger-Leverage’ maintained by a blackmailer-Dominatrix.
Let’s say you’re literally “stuck” in a blackmail contract that costs you $1,000 a month. There are two ways out of this, one is to break the contract and pray that Dom leaves you alone, and the second is to call your lawyer and prepare for a fight (or you might have luck and she’ll back off when you yell ‘Uncle’). Your option to ask for mercy might work, but terminating the contract would be an incredible risk. So let’s say you’re stuck watching the output of the process. You are sure to win the case and think you might even win a few dollars upfront. However, you soon realize that the Civil Court option is following a darker path than the one you are currently on. You see, Dominatrix stuck to the terms and didn’t divulge any of her secrets due to cosmetic fund payments. If you take this to court, you will effectively be exposing yourself (as long as the signed contract is evidenced, your involvement with a dominatrix will be known, and your sexual specifics will become public, because it is very likely that someone you know will be watching the matter {not to mention the delivery network that makes FedEx look like a snail mail: “word of mouth”} – and you can be sure she’ll bring every pervert/secret detail she has to you to court). So, taking legal action would virtually guarantee your “out”, while the risk of exposure is only possible if you stick with it. While the correct course of action (which is a return to the status quo) is already pretty clear, there are a lot more nuts and bolts that would fall into your engine if you proceeded further (like trying to locate the Dom, getting a summons and take him to court). Quite a difficult situation, isn’t it?
LA The fact is that many blackmail providers are aware of this dilemma in which the consumer would be trapped. So, like the countless other levers in her courtroom (pun intended), she uses it to her advantage. As long as she doesn’t go mad with greed or post it on Youtube in a PMS attack, there’s little worry about her “pet” going feral. If the aforementioned dangers that can be caused by legal action continue to outweigh the risks of Dom himself, this leverage remains with her.